Question for Thomas or Bill

[billr]

www.blogtalkradio.com/bigfoothotspot/2014/01/20/sc-ep11-the-siege-at-honobia
Thomas or Bill
Just after the 38 minute mark of the program above, the guy claims to have talked to Bob Gimlin, and that Bob told him that they did not attempt to follow "Patty" because they were scared of the two larger sasquatch that were with her

Has either Bob or John Green ever mentioned this in your conversations with them

[thomassteenburg]

Both men thought that there might be other creatures in the area. It was in the back of their minds. In fact when Bob started to Gallup his horse after Patty, Roger yelled for him to stop as he felt uneasy being left on the site alone without his horse and rifle. However they have always pointed out that they saw no evidence of other creatures in the area. Patty's footprints where the only ones seen at the film site, no others.

Thomas Steenburg

Just adding this edit to the post now having heard the program. It is possible that in their minds the thought of two more creatures in the area, which were the result of the Blue Creek Mountain tracks investigated near by,just a few weeks before. One set of prints was 15 inches long, the other 13 inches long. It is assumed if two sasquatch were responsible for these track ways nether one of them was Patty. But again nether Roger or Bob saw any other footprints besides those left by Patty on the day of the filming. If the show host is saying Bob told them they were sure that two larger creatures were near by then Bob told him a different story than the one he has told me many times over the last 25 years. In my opinion the program host were being a bit overly dramatic.

Thomas Steenburg

[billr]

Thanks Thomas
I had not heard of them seeing three sasquatch in total before

[bigfoothunter]

The Radio Show was a typical classic case how unreliable information can seep into the record when coming from a third or fourth party. The host was hearing of a story that the guest heard from someone else .... who had told something that Gimlin allegedly said to him. (sigh~)

The fact is that Green had gone to see the Onion Mountain tracks which were said to be 12 inches in length. The next day there had been two sets of tracks found on Blue Creek Mountain that were 13 and 15 inches in length. It was these various track sizes that caused Bob and Roger to believe there may be a family of these creatures in the area. The Times Standard spoke to Roger the day after the film was taken and mentions three various size tracks having been seen in the area, but doesn't quote either man as to their size. Jack Webster interviewed Roger and Bob during the time of the films showing Vancouver in BC just days after the screening at DeAtley's on the 22nd of October. All Roger said in that interview was that they had heard about three sets of tracks being found in the area, so he called Gimlin back because he was concerned that a big male may be close by.
www.bigfootencounters.com/interviews/radiopatterson.htm

[billr]

Thanks
That was the version that I had heard
When the guy on the program said that Bob Gimlin told he that there were two more it surprised me as I had not heard that before
I know both you and Thomas have talked to Bob so I thought I would check