vilnoori
Really into this!
Bone Collector
Posts: 547
|
Post by vilnoori on Apr 30, 2012 3:16:50 GMT -5
new article with photo. I don't think that is a baby, but it sure does look like some kind of aboriginal with a furry skin cape going over it's head and neck. I even see skin sewn over the wrist, and thumb, leaving fingers free. It is probably a costume but something about the posture and the muscle tone of that arm is intriguing. If that is a female it is a very strong one. bigfootevidence.blogspot.ca/2012/04/in-case-you-missed-it-purported-bigfoot.html?spref=fb |
|
|
|
Post by Jason C. on Apr 30, 2012 15:58:55 GMT -5
|
|
duallie
Has opinions now!
Posts: 191
|
Post by duallie on Apr 30, 2012 16:05:11 GMT -5
not only is that not a bf, there is nothing at all clinging to it's back. how can they show a clear picture of someone in a costume, and then somehow claim that a baby is clinging onto it's back? we can see plain as day that there is nothing on it's back. it's bad enough that they are trying to pass that off as a bf. but then they try to say that something that isn't there is actually there.  how dumb do they think everyone is? how did he get so close? where are the pictures of the deep footprints? he should have been able to get many more pictures if he was that close. most animals don't run away when something gets too close to their young. they defend. and something as large as a bf would surely do the same, not run away and hide. those are absolutely brutal photos. the fact that someone is trying to pass that off as a bf is so ridiculous, and that bf sites would support it in any way is embarrassing. i wish more sites would actually question some of the material they are sent. instead of just saying it's "great evidence", and "very interesting". |
|
|
|
Post by Jason C. on Apr 30, 2012 18:13:10 GMT -5
not only is that not a bf, there is nothing at all clinging to it's back... i wish more sites would actually question some of the material they are sent. instead of just saying it's "great evidence", and "very interesting". I agree Duallie. There is absolutely NOTHING is those photos. The purpose of BigfootEvidence.blogsport.ca seems to be throwing everything against the wall and seeing what sticks. There isn't any serious authorship going on -- just the collection and regurgitation of other people's info. The best thing we can do is ignore it. It's not even worth picking it apart. Aloha, Jason |
|
Richard
Really into this!
Thinking I should be out in the bush ...
Posts: 562
|
Post by Richard on Apr 30, 2012 19:51:53 GMT -5
This is simply absurd ...
I agree, there is nothing on the "back" of this thing .. in fact I'd say it was a great carpet from the 70s and nothing else.
This is a HUGE problem with the internet, ANYONE can get 5min of fame, and make outlandish claims ... the problem is that it detracts from actual sighting reports.
I really wish we could go back in time to the 90s when digital cameras were scarce, the internet was for true geeks and it took effort and time to do something - not a "twixer" of vodka and "presto", you have a samsquanch trying to break into your mobile home.
Yes, for the record, I *AM* a Trailer Park Boys fan ;D
|
|
duallie
Has opinions now!
Posts: 191
|
Post by duallie on May 24, 2012 14:45:10 GMT -5
This is simply absurd ... I agree, there is nothing on the "back" of this thing .. in fact I'd say it was a great carpet from the 70s and nothing else. This is a HUGE problem with the internet, ANYONE can get 5min of fame, and make outlandish claims ... the problem is that it detracts from actual sighting reports. I really wish we could go back in time to the 90s when digital cameras were scarce, the internet was for true geeks and it took effort and time to do something - not a "twixer" of vodka and "presto", you have a samsquanch trying to break into your mobile home. Yes, for the record, I *AM* a Trailer Park Boys fan ;Dwe won't hold that against you, richard. ;D alot of my friends were fanatical with that show. i could never get into it. i've seen a few, and got laughs from it, but it just never grabbed me. |
|
|
|
Post by westerncanadian on Jun 6, 2012 16:52:24 GMT -5
This is the Atoka hoax which we dealt with several years ago. Of course it is not real. It is a stupid prank.
|
|
billr
Really into this!
Posts: 856
|
Post by billr on Jun 6, 2012 21:32:45 GMT -5
It just shows how this type of misinformation/hoax can keep coming back time and time again
|
|
