Post by bigfoothunter on May 5, 2013 23:10:36 GMT -5
Body characteristic similarities between a bear and the Jacobs subject as I see them are:
The image above is of a comparison between a black bear and the Jacobs subject in photo 1. The alike areas of interest are numbered and referenced on each subject in the illustration.
1) The hump of the right shoulder are noticeable on both subjects.
2) The dip in the contour of the back between the rump and the shoulders are similar.
3) The rump similarities are remarkable in that the rump of a bear rounds down the body to a point near the middle of the back leg just behind and above the knee. The Jacob subject does the same.
The Sasquatch in the Patterson film has a buttocks much like a humans and connects to the back of the upper part of the leg.
4) The outstretched leg on each subject also has an amazing similarity from the distance from the hip to the knee and from the knee to the ankle.
5) An elongated neck sits between the shoulder and the head of a bear. While the neck isn't readily seen in the Jacobs photo, the top of the shoulder-line's arc can be seen traveling from the top of the right shoulder and across to the left shoulder and on down the left leg.
The Sasquatch, like the great apes are reported to have what is often described as a 'bull-neck'. Like with the chimps and gorillas, the Sasquatch head sits down in the shoulders. The head seen in this photo of the Jacob subject appears far too low to be set down into the shoulders. I am certain that the bear experts that saw this is one of the reasons they felt they were looking at a bear.
Body characteristic similarities observed in the second Jacobs photo as I see them are:
1 and 2) These two areas represent the lighter colored muzzle(2) and the black nose(1) found on a black bear. The inverted head of the Jacobs subject shows the same as bears do rub their heads on the ground to mark their scent.
3) This reference goes to the black fur surrounding the lighter area that I have referenced as the muzzle area seen on black bears. These areas are narrowed above the nose and wider below the nose as it wraps around under the jaw. I notice a strong similarity in this pattern on the Jacobs subject. is this just coincidence - I don't think so. I found this similarity in particular to be quite compelling for the Jacob subject being a black bear.
4) The rounded back above the back legs is truly visible in the bear and a dead give away in my view concerning the Jacobs subject. This is truly the spine of a quadruped in action in my view.
The bear in the Jacobs photo, as I believe it to be, has a more pronounced arch in its spine as it lowered its head all the way to the ground, but each arcs (bear and Jacob subject) at the same hinge point location. The is not the characteristic of a bi-ped spine from anything I have seen that didn't involve altering an outline.
Below is an image going around the Internet whereas the spine on each subject appears to match in contour.
However, a check of this persons work by an individual going by the name 'Gigantofootecus' exposed the removal of the hump seen on the Jacobs subject. (see below)
Anyone believe that the removal of this hump was mere coincidence ... I certainly do not think so.
5) The stomach area.
6) Both the bear and the Jacob subject have short forefeet. More importantly the semi-rounded foot pattern of a bear is exactly what I see in one of the views of the Jacob subjects foot. (see below)
Compare to the toe pattern of a Sasquatch ...
Both have legs that attach to the rear of the foot near the heel. A Sasquatch (per Patterson's film) shows a leg that attached far forward of an extended heel. From what I deemed reliable 10" tracks seen as far as 20 miles up Lake Harrison in 2002, the characteristics of the tracks left behind by the Patterson creature mirrored things observed in the 10" to 10.5" tracks.
Both sets of tracks showed evidence of a padded foot - toe movement - weight distribution across the inside of the foot - and a mid-tarsal break. This mid-tarsal break characteristic was not only seen in some of the Patterson tracks, but on the film itself when the animal cupped its foot prior to striking the ground ... something a human foot with a stiff arch cannot do and more-so while wearing slippers or any other footwear.
The claim made by some that a juvenile Sasquatch may have a foot unlike that of an adult was mere speculation in my view and based on the appearance of 10.5" - 13" - 14.5" and 16" tracks that I have studied, I found that excuse highly unlikely.
The image above is of a comparison between a black bear and the Jacobs subject in photo 1. The alike areas of interest are numbered and referenced on each subject in the illustration.
1) The hump of the right shoulder are noticeable on both subjects.
2) The dip in the contour of the back between the rump and the shoulders are similar.
3) The rump similarities are remarkable in that the rump of a bear rounds down the body to a point near the middle of the back leg just behind and above the knee. The Jacob subject does the same.
The Sasquatch in the Patterson film has a buttocks much like a humans and connects to the back of the upper part of the leg.
4) The outstretched leg on each subject also has an amazing similarity from the distance from the hip to the knee and from the knee to the ankle.
5) An elongated neck sits between the shoulder and the head of a bear. While the neck isn't readily seen in the Jacobs photo, the top of the shoulder-line's arc can be seen traveling from the top of the right shoulder and across to the left shoulder and on down the left leg.
The Sasquatch, like the great apes are reported to have what is often described as a 'bull-neck'. Like with the chimps and gorillas, the Sasquatch head sits down in the shoulders. The head seen in this photo of the Jacob subject appears far too low to be set down into the shoulders. I am certain that the bear experts that saw this is one of the reasons they felt they were looking at a bear.
Body characteristic similarities observed in the second Jacobs photo as I see them are:
1 and 2) These two areas represent the lighter colored muzzle(2) and the black nose(1) found on a black bear. The inverted head of the Jacobs subject shows the same as bears do rub their heads on the ground to mark their scent.
3) This reference goes to the black fur surrounding the lighter area that I have referenced as the muzzle area seen on black bears. These areas are narrowed above the nose and wider below the nose as it wraps around under the jaw. I notice a strong similarity in this pattern on the Jacobs subject. is this just coincidence - I don't think so. I found this similarity in particular to be quite compelling for the Jacob subject being a black bear.
4) The rounded back above the back legs is truly visible in the bear and a dead give away in my view concerning the Jacobs subject. This is truly the spine of a quadruped in action in my view.
The bear in the Jacobs photo, as I believe it to be, has a more pronounced arch in its spine as it lowered its head all the way to the ground, but each arcs (bear and Jacob subject) at the same hinge point location. The is not the characteristic of a bi-ped spine from anything I have seen that didn't involve altering an outline.
Below is an image going around the Internet whereas the spine on each subject appears to match in contour.
However, a check of this persons work by an individual going by the name 'Gigantofootecus' exposed the removal of the hump seen on the Jacobs subject. (see below)
Anyone believe that the removal of this hump was mere coincidence ... I certainly do not think so.
5) The stomach area.
6) Both the bear and the Jacob subject have short forefeet. More importantly the semi-rounded foot pattern of a bear is exactly what I see in one of the views of the Jacob subjects foot. (see below)
Compare to the toe pattern of a Sasquatch ...
Both have legs that attach to the rear of the foot near the heel. A Sasquatch (per Patterson's film) shows a leg that attached far forward of an extended heel. From what I deemed reliable 10" tracks seen as far as 20 miles up Lake Harrison in 2002, the characteristics of the tracks left behind by the Patterson creature mirrored things observed in the 10" to 10.5" tracks.
Both sets of tracks showed evidence of a padded foot - toe movement - weight distribution across the inside of the foot - and a mid-tarsal break. This mid-tarsal break characteristic was not only seen in some of the Patterson tracks, but on the film itself when the animal cupped its foot prior to striking the ground ... something a human foot with a stiff arch cannot do and more-so while wearing slippers or any other footwear.
The claim made by some that a juvenile Sasquatch may have a foot unlike that of an adult was mere speculation in my view and based on the appearance of 10.5" - 13" - 14.5" and 16" tracks that I have studied, I found that excuse highly unlikely.
