Theories why no dead Sasquatches have been found

[Deleted]

I never have come across any and I was curious if there were any theories on why the lack of bodies - or none for that matter - have ever been found.

I for one wouldn't be surprised to find that Sasquatches take care of their own after death much like us. As for what they do with the bodies, that's another question, but I can't imagine they leave them were they die. Perhaps they move them somewhere where they know we don't frequent, somekind of graveyard.

Thanks everyone.

[Deleted]

littlebigfoot said:

I never have come across any and I was curious if there were any theories on why the lack of bodies - or none for that matter - have ever been found.

I for one wouldn't be surprised to find that Sasquatches take care of their own after death much like us. As for what they do with the bodies, that's another question, but I can't imagine they leave them were they die. Perhaps they move them somewhere where they know we don't frequent, somekind of graveyard.

Thanks everyone.

Hi Littlebigfoot,

Welcome to the West Coast Sasquatch Research forum.

If sasquatch is closely related to humans like many researchers believe, I believe your theory of them taking care of their dead is right on the money.

I always try and put the shoe on the other foot and ask people exactly how many human bodies do they think sasquatch would find lying around if they came looking where we live with that particular purpose in mind?

In all my travels throughout the wilds of British Columbia I have yet to find a poor, unfortunate, deceased human. But then again, I haven't found any dead sasquatch in plain sight either.

Bushman

[bushape]

What Im sure youve read before in regards to nature taking care of itself is very much true.
Ive hunted all over BC for years and have yet to come across what I would consider a "natural" death. Even the remains of a kill a year later are rarely visible, ie: bones etc., even if u know the exact location. I would speculate that finding one be beyond the scope of a needle in a haystack.

[Deleted]

I would agree with bushape but would add that any bodies would be scattered & taken care of by scavengers who would eat the body & take bones with them. I'd say within a few days any dead bodies would be totally gone.

[Deleted]

It's the "Elephant Graveyard" phenomenon. Where are all their bones?? Nature does not meet our expectations. Rare animals (Bears, mtn lions, wolverines for example) just don't get preserved as we would hope due to simple frequency. Preservation/fossilization is an EXTREMELY rare phenomenon in the first place; a rare animal such as our BF puts not just the chances of preservation in the remote - it puts the DISCOVERY of such remains in the SUPER RARE REMOTE. So remote it's not really worth following as a research strategy.

[shawn]

I'm not at all surprised that no one has ever come across a dead sasquatch there are just far to many predators that would find and feed on a dead carcass. I don't know of anyone that has come across a dead mtn. lion either or lynx or bobcat and the list can go on. I don't believe that they bury their dead that's a human characteristic no animal does that and that's all a sasquatch is an animal.

[Richard]

I would be hesitant to say that Sasquatch cannot be a proto-human. After all, what defines a human? Were Neanderthal human? Remember many great apes have shown very human-like behavior. Sadly humans have shown very animalistic behaviors as well, making the distinction harder and harder to make.
However I too see no problem with the lack of discovered skeletal remains as if I am not mistaken no one has found a gorilla carcass either (that has died of natural causes).
Richard

[Sean V.]

Jul 26, 2012 10:40:28 GMT -5 shawn said:

I don't believe that they bury their dead that's a human characteristic no animal does that

Not true.

Chimpanzee and even elephants have been witnessed performing a sort of burial rite. What's to say that Sasquatch doesn't do the same, no one can prove it either way. Not yet.