The lack of compelling evidence...

[rastaman]

still makes many scientists to remain to be non-believers in Bigfoot.

www.cbc.ca/news/canada/british-columbia/from-petroglyphs-to-audio-recordings-b-c-scientist-advocates-for-examination-of-sasquatch-evidence-1.4274944

[Richard]

Sept 8, 2017 3:47:08 GMT -5 rastaman said:

still makes many scientists to remain to be non-believers in Bigfoot.

www.cbc.ca/news/canada/british-columbia/from-petroglyphs-to-audio-recordings-b-c-scientist-advocates-for-examination-of-sasquatch-evidence-1.4274944

Remember in science, one does not believe or believe in something. The idea of scientific evidence to support claims is all that is required. The notion of it being a belief alludes to trust, faith or confidence that something is true and inherently precludes the scientific method.

Richard