|
|
Post by rastaman on Apr 21, 2015 12:57:40 GMT -5
|
|
Cryptosaurian
Has opinions now!
Change is in the air...and so is the Search!
Posts: 263
|
Post by Cryptosaurian on Mar 9, 2016 22:20:38 GMT -5
I agree with 4 out of 5 of those reasons Prothero put forth; the reason I disagree with number five is because people could also easily have misidentified something (like a creature-like log) and then later saw images of dinosaurs....and that could be partly how people think that "Nessie" could be a plesiosaur.
I, for one, strongly diagree with that. Plesiosaurs need to have air because of their breathing systems and it realy is too cold for a plesiosaur type creature to exist in the loch.
There MAY indeed be something in Loch Ness....but to be honest, I put it down as either an eel, log or misidentification. Just too many things going against this critter.....
Next! (Now if you guy have anything contrary to what I said and why, I wish to know and am happy to be proven wrong).
|
|
