|
|
Post by bigfoothunter on Sept 27, 2014 1:06:43 GMT -5
www.mrtimes.com/news/bigfoot-followers-powwow-at-home-1.491352I could only shake my head as Thomas Steenburg told me of some of the things that he had heard being claimed at the recent gathering in Maple Ridge last week. If I understood things correctly, several of the people who hosted this gathering were alleging that they have broken a type of language code used by Sasquatch through a series of arranged stones and other items. The first thing that came to mind was to ask him how these individuals were able to make such outlandish proclamations as I have yet to see where any books have been written by Sasquatch describing what these so-called symbols mean ... nor have I heard any interviews with Sasquatch where the creature explains how to read their alleged pictographs. And if such an explanation was given, then Thomas must have missed it. I have not forgotten how one of these individuals (Randy Brisson) was caught red-handed and not that long ago throwing rocks on an outing with Steenburg and some BFRO members in an attempt to trick them into believing that they were being tossed by Sasquatch. Now it appears that the latest craze is going to be that this small sect of chosen individuals speak Sasquatch's language. If it was stated to me correctly - one pictograph said to be left by Sasquatch was that she was pregnant with child. No clear explanation given as to how that was determined, but with this select group ... they probably hadn't thought that far ahead, thus leaving me to wonder if these people are just plain crackpots or merely liars.
|
|
billr
Really into this!
Posts: 856
|
Post by billr on Sept 27, 2014 16:06:23 GMT -5
Bill
What Thomas was talking about there, they claimed that a female sasquatch that used a symbol H to represent her.
She placed a rock inside the symbol to indicate that she was pregnant
This sasquatch had twins in the spring
I will copy and paste some of the comments that I had written on the BCSCC Facebook page
|
|
billr
Really into this!
Posts: 856
|
Post by billr on Sept 27, 2014 19:11:42 GMT -5
These are posts that I put on the BCSCC Facebook page
I did not include replies from others, so you are only getting 1/2 of the conversation
Bill R Ah, it was a magical night. I was quite surprised that Thomas didn't have a stroke.
Bill R Yes poor Bob evidently had a bad fall from a mule and cannot travel due to doctors orders. I did feel bad for Dr. Bindernagle as he was expecting John and Bob to be there and his presentation was going to be somewhat of a tribute to them
Bill R xxxxx, I think Thomas video taped a little from each presentation. I personally think that burning a $10 bill would have been a better use of my money than attending that event
Bill R Some good points. For some reason sasquatch hair only has microcondial dna, science can't get nuclear dna from the hair. Sasquatch hair has human microcondial dna because of our shared ancestry.
Bill R Thom had 3 hairs submitted that are sasquatch, but the dna tests were abandoned too soon because the scientists didn't understand that we share the same microcondial dna
Bill R Thom and Brian have over 10,000 pictures of Sasquatch writing (glyphs made with twigs) from all over north American. Sasquatch can change the position of twigs in a glyph when you are standing over the glyph and look away for 15 seconds without you knowing that they are doing it
Bill R A female sasquatch that used a "H" glyph told them that she was pregnant by placing a stone inside her glyph. She had twins in the spring
Bill R Sasquatch are "like us in some ways, and not like us in some ways" and they are an ancient people. They mark the seasons as they bent 2 trees to form a V in the one presenters "prayer place". As she was doing her prayers the week before the spring equinox she discovered that on the equinox the V perfectly framed the sun
Bill R If sasquatch are raiding your gardens, go outside and tell them that they can have 1/2 as you need the rest for your family. And they will only take 1/2
Bill R Thom is LDS and knew one glyph was meant for him because it was shaped like symbol of a certain LDS prophet. He did say the name but I forgot
Bill R At one point Thomas turned to me as said "should I ask ....................." I replied only if you want all hell to break out
|
|
|
|
Post by thomassteenburg on Sept 28, 2014 0:17:11 GMT -5
All i will say concerning this magical knight is this. This whole presentation was a total waste of time and served no useful purpose or generated any useful information on this on going mystery at all. Other then of course a fascinating look into the workings of self deluded minds. Dr. Bindernagel was an exception and I had the feeling he really didn't want to be there.
Thomas Steenburg
|
|
|
|
Post by bigfoothunter on Sept 29, 2014 9:32:00 GMT -5
That's odd .... We knew weeks earlier that Green and Gimlin were not going to attend that particular gathering - I guess someone didn't pass that information on to Bindernagle so he would not cancel as well.
I am however still disappointed that no one seemed to ask the presenters why it was that they believe to have broken this Sasquatch language code of graphs. Even if someone came across an arrangement of sticks and rocks on the ground - without knowing who put them there and why, then any ideas as to what they represent is just left up to ones vivid imagination and is what must have been thought by those who attended the gathering, but didn't seem to care to ask any pertinent questions so to possibly become better informed. Is it not the responsibility of the researcher to ask sensible legitimate questions even when the presentation seems a bit far afield of any real logic?
|
|
billr
Really into this!
Posts: 856
|
Post by billr on Sept 30, 2014 2:57:33 GMT -5
They stated clearly that they did not know what most of the glyphs meant
They were also clear that when they said H or P for a glyph they were not saying that is what it was, it was just a similar shape to a letter and that made it convenient to catalog them
There were a couple of people that did ask questions, however the answers were just more bs
I was not prepared to waste my time listing to more of their bs
I don't see the point in debating with crackpots at their party
|
|
billr
Really into this!
Posts: 856
|
Post by billr on Sept 30, 2014 3:00:51 GMT -5
They did say that they first stumbled onto the glyphs because sasquatch were placing a glyph beside a clear sasquatch track
This enabled them to link the glyphs to track to sasquatch
|
|
|
|
Post by bigfoothunter on Sept 30, 2014 4:41:31 GMT -5
They did say that they first stumbled onto the glyphs because sasquatch were placing a glyph beside a clear sasquatch track This enabled them to link the glyphs to track to sasquatch Did they show photos of a clear Sasquatch track(s) next to the so-called glyph? I thought Steenburg may have said that photos of alleged tracks were shown, as well as photos of so-called glyphs, but no photos of a track and glyph together. Does anyone know any different??? |
|
billr
Really into this!
Posts: 856
|
Post by billr on Oct 1, 2014 0:53:31 GMT -5
They showed photos of tracks and glyphs separately
Iirc they showed 1 track and glyph together
But when they talked about sasquatch (unseen) changing the shape of the glyphs by their feet when they looked away for 15 seconds
I found it hard to really concentrate on every thing they said
One of my favorites was the woman that was looking at a glyph
As she was looking at the glyph she was thinking about should they build a cabin
When she came back, the glyph was changed to a cabin shape so she knew that the sasquatch were telling her to build the cabin
When the woman was asked if sasquatch could do paranormal or inter-dimensional things her reply was that she doesn't use those terms
She has seen elders do some of the same things that sasquatch do and science has not figured out how to do it
All of them kept saying if you saw what we have seen you would be amazed
Or the other response was believe us we have no reason to lie
I don't believe the ancient people or paranormal crappie
Or for that matter that we share a common ancestry going back 30,000 to 35,000 years ago, and that their microcondial dna is human
|
|
billr
Really into this!
Posts: 856
|
Post by billr on Oct 1, 2014 1:00:19 GMT -5
People that did presentations
Brian Bland
Thom Cantrall
Michael Beers
Randy Brissom (just helped from the back when Thom and Brian spoke)
Arla Collette Williams
Dr. John Bindernagle
|
|
|
|
Post by bigfoothunter on Oct 1, 2014 9:07:31 GMT -5
She has seen elders do some of the same things that sasquatch do and science has not figured out how to do it All of them kept saying if you saw what we have seen you would be amazed Or the other response was believe us we have no reason to lie The people we are speaking of never seem to have a real grasp of the over-simplified self-serving lunacy of the things they say. They have shown endless photos of the things they have alleged to have seen and no one has seemingly been amazed by it. The comment they make about having 'no reason to lie' is a prime example of this. Any hoaxer can use that self-serving general statement. When the BFRO people and Steenburg caught Randy Brisson throwing rocks on their hike, I don't recall Randy saying when asked if this was true ... 'they must have caught me red-handed because they would have no reason to lie'. The reason for not saying such a thing in that instance is obvious as even a young child can readily see the usefulness of not making such a statement when it would work against him or her. But when these particular individuals think it works in their favor, and that's all they got, then they use that line and proceed to pretend that it makes perfect sense. In the end - it seems somewhat obvious to me that these particular individuals invited Gimlin and Green to attend their gathering so to entice the public into attending. And when they knew or should have known that these men were not attending their gathering - they didn't appear to make that information publicly known. But then again - What reason would they have for withholding that information from potential attendees who are willing to pay an admission fee of $10/per person because think they will be meeting John Green and Bob Gimlin.  |
|
|
|
Post by in the know on Oct 1, 2014 21:34:44 GMT -5
www.mrtimes.com/news/bigfoot-followers-powwow-at-home-1.491352I could only shake my head as Thomas Steenburg told me of some of the things that he had heard being claimed at the recent gathering in Maple Ridge last week. If I understood things correctly, several of the people who hosted this gathering were alleging that they have broken a type of language code used by Sasquatch through a series of arranged stones and other items. The first thing that came to mind was to ask him how these individuals were able to make such outlandish proclamations as I have yet to see where any books have been written by Sasquatch describing what these so-called symbols mean ... nor have I heard any interviews with Sasquatch where the creature explains how to read their alleged pictographs. And if such an explanation was given, then Thomas must have missed it. I have not forgotten how one of these individuals (Randy Brisson) was caught red-handed and not that long ago throwing rocks on an outing with Steenburg and some BFRO members in an attempt to trick them into believing that they were being tossed by Sasquatch. Now it appears that the latest craze is going to be that this small sect of chosen individuals speak Sasquatch's language. If it was stated to me correctly - one pictograph said to be left by Sasquatch was that she was pregnant with child. No clear explanation given as to how that was determined, but with this select group ... they probably hadn't thought that far ahead, thus leaving me to wonder if these people are just plain crackpots or merely liars. |
|
|
|
Post by Gerry on Feb 19, 2015 15:33:03 GMT -5
This was a missed opportunity to slip in a gallon of 'cool aid'. They would have drank it! And the world would be a better place.
|
|
|
|
Post by bigfoothunter on Apr 29, 2015 17:04:33 GMT -5
Here is the remarks to me from a screwball (Dr. Squatch) who thinks he knows it all and doesn't need to do a proper investigation;
bmjfk63 2 hours ago
Someone wrote me saying the footprints were not in the mud on earlier films of the area and I ask myself ..... So someone from the area (houses are not 100 feet away) walked through the muddy area which explains the arch of the foot shape, as well as the semi-rounded toe area that only footwear provides.
Again, has the people living in the area been questioned about any of this as nothing was said about doing so from what I have heard so far. This is Investigations 101 stuff that should have been done. For all I know - some people in the area have used 'blue' bags to sit their garbage out for pick-up. The author of the videos has not bothered to find out before saying they are placed on the ground by Sasquatch. And the author of the video has said that the Sasquatch walked over the dirt ball diamond infield for years and yet he has not posted a single photo of a Sasquatch walking through the area, no photos of Sasquatch footprints on the infield, nor offered a single name of a witness living in the area as having seen what he claims took place. Is not being thorough for his part of in conducting a good and complete investigation?
Read more
Reply ·
Dr. Squatch 13 minutes ago
+bmjfk63 You want me to go door to door interviewing people about BF? NO THANKS! I don't need to ask anyone what I already know for certain. People do not put them out for trash pick-up here.I'm done trying trail cams, they do not work! They only come through here between 12am-4am....and my videos show how they have it marked, not to come up through the woods next to the baseball field anymore.You still seem to question another researcher....so I'll question you, where's you 20 years of research proof.
Reply ·
·
bmjfk63 1 second ago
+Dr. Squatch
I expect you to be a responsible investigator. The first thing one would do as a responsible investigator and with peoples houses just across the street is to see if they have had any experiences that would confirm your theories. There is really no logical reason not to do it except to avoid discovering you may have been wrong. The 'I don't need to ask anyone anything because I know it all' is a character flaw you might wish to consider working on for gathering info from others is vital in any investigation. This holds especially true when you failed to notice the semi-round arc of the footwear or that there was a time difference as to when the footwear prints were made and when you were there.
And before the Sasquatch stopped crossing the ball diamond for all those years that you told us about .... what excuse do you have for not photographing their tracks that should have been present on the infield if you think they left such deep impressions near the street? These are legitimate concerns and should not be evaded.
As to my finds - they are documented in photos, film footage, and reports.
Cheers!
|
|
|
|
Post by rastaman on May 3, 2015 1:38:42 GMT -5
I still have one of these left over for Dr. Squatch.  |
|
