billr
Really into this!
Posts: 856
|
Post by billr on Aug 12, 2014 15:50:35 GMT -5
|
|
billr
Really into this!
Posts: 856
|
Post by billr on Aug 12, 2014 16:05:06 GMT -5
Like Thomas, both examiners concluded that a cast of Todd Standing's face was used for the Sasquatch face
|
|
sawone
Has opinions now!
Posts: 332 
|
Post by sawone on Aug 12, 2014 19:19:16 GMT -5
I read that breakdown of the muppetsquatch pics via a BFF link earlier today, and agree 100%. They looked hokey from the very beginning, but it's nice to see a detailed analysis of why they look so phoney.
|
|
Sheldon
Has opinions now!
Posts: 103
|
Post by Sheldon on May 8, 2018 4:21:41 GMT -5
File missing - ah well - too late to the party. An aside > Thinker Thunker did a recent analysis of Standing & his so called pics of a peeking something - turns out majority of their facial features match/sync up.. www.youtube.com/watch?v=kbZn00RFkHU |
|
billr
Really into this!
Posts: 856
|
Post by billr on May 9, 2018 0:04:49 GMT -5
I put zero weight in thinker thunkers work.
He concluded that the Mission footage was a sasquatch even after we gave him the name of the person that was the subject in the film
|
|
Sheldon
Has opinions now!
Posts: 103
|
Post by Sheldon on May 9, 2018 0:23:15 GMT -5
Don't know anything about that billr though his videos remain interesting.
He said/she said - man I'm just sorting it out
|
|
billr
Really into this!
Posts: 856
|
Post by billr on May 14, 2018 18:26:15 GMT -5
Not really he said she said.
If you like YouTube you can see a bunch of the information that I posted on Bigfoot Tony's channel on the Mission video.
As for the link that I posted earlier in this thread it just worked for me so maybe try it again
|
|
billr
Really into this!
Posts: 856
|
Post by billr on May 14, 2018 19:10:07 GMT -5
|
|
Sheldon
Has opinions now!
Posts: 103
|
Post by Sheldon on May 15, 2018 3:09:31 GMT -5
Will check it out - thank you billr!
|
|
|
|
Post by westerncanadian on May 19, 2018 23:24:53 GMT -5
Like Bill, I am less than impressed with Thinker Thunker's conclusions.
They are not necessarily the only outcomes possible.
As for Standing, why are we even talking about this waste of space?
Ignore him.
|
|
Sheldon
Has opinions now!
Posts: 103
|
Post by Sheldon on Jun 2, 2018 3:41:51 GMT -5
Like any analysis on Sa:sq’ets we take the 'bad' with the 'good' - Always been since I was first exposed to this back in 1970 (which btw was a presentation by either John &/or Rene at the University of Alberta, of Roger & Bob's movie)
Looking at visual evidence has always fascinated me - as too written stories, that won't end. I come at it with an open mind yet know many just out for profit. I hope I'm not entirely gullible & able to look at 'evidence' - being able to separate the probable from the preposterous.
Thunker asks his audience for criticism after his videos and receives it, that said, I do value Mr Thunker & appreciate his efforts at visual evidence somewhat more (read a lot) than Mr Standing, Mr Biscardi, Mr Marx et al.
|
|
