|
Post by bigfoothunter on Oct 15, 2012 0:31:09 GMT -5
I recently heard a portion of a radio show (shown above) who had Brian Bland from Maple Ridge as a guest. In a search of his name/sasquatch/facebook ... I came across a lot of photos and one of them was this one see below ... Does anyone know the source for this photo? If not, does anyone know how to get in touch with Brian Bland (email address?) so to find out the photo's history?? (see below)
|
|
|
Post by kokanee on Oct 15, 2012 10:22:31 GMT -5
That photo looked familiar. When u google Randy Brisson you find a photo with the same suit, same trees, same stumps and saplings. The main difference with this one though, there is someone standing 6 feet from the "creature". Its a shame if the photos are real. Have a look. [/img] Attachments:
|
|
|
Post by kokanee on Oct 15, 2012 10:44:48 GMT -5
Also, I listened to the interview, and most of his time researching is spent with Randy Brisson. I am not going to state an opinion, as I have no personal experience with either. Here is a link to a bunch of photos that the radio show put together of Brian Blands work. I did not see the photos below in it. www.ghostsofrubyridge.com/brian/
|
|
|
Post by thomassteenburg on Oct 16, 2012 0:12:47 GMT -5
Kokanee, We did notice that the two photos were taken at the same place, what we are trying to find is the story which gos with the one bigfoothunter has posted to see if the explanation is very different from the one with the man in it, when the a person in question sent it to me in 2009, he gave me a story which went with it. Curious to see if the story is different for this one or are they claiming that someone struck pay dirt at the same place at the same time. or the same place at a different time.
Thomas Steenburg
|
|
|
Post by canadiansasquatch on Oct 16, 2012 0:54:41 GMT -5
hello i am Brian Bland and this photo has nothing to do with Randy Brisson or myself. it certainly was not part of the pics from the show i did. have no idea where it came from?
|
|
|
Post by westerncanadian on Oct 16, 2012 11:25:11 GMT -5
Oh, please I thought we had heard the last of Brisson. He's been completely discredited in these forums. What more do we need to know about him and his ways?
|
|
|
Post by bigfoothunter on Oct 16, 2012 23:16:02 GMT -5
hello i am Brian Bland and this photo has nothing to do with Randy Brisson or myself. it certainly was not part of the pics from the show i did. have no idea where it came from? Brian, The photo does indeed have something to do with Brisson. Brisson sent Thomas Steenburg what was said to be his photos. The photo below was in that set. (see image below) Steenburg then asked for info about the photo and Brisson gave only a vague response. When Tom pressed on, Brisson then made a claim that the photo was taken by a woman in Washington that he knew as if he didn't know the details. (You can ask yourself if it seems likely that Brisson was shown a photo from a friend and didn't ask for any details himself) So when it was believed that Brisson had dodged a bullet for the moment, Tom soon accepted an invite to go on a forest outing with Randy. Several others accompanied Brisson and a guy named 'Zollie' (spelling may be wrong) who had invited Thomas on this particular hike. The group's goal was to merely watch Randy as it had become suspected that when Randy is along, rocks were thrown, but never when Randy wasn't on the outing and/or in plain sight. The end result was that Randy was eventually observed taking rocks from his pocket and throwing them when he thought the opportunity arose to so so without detection. Unfortuneately for Brisson - he got caught in the act by several independent witnesses (some that I know that did not want to believe they had been hoaxed by Randy on previous outings). The pisser was that some people had come a fair distance and spent their own hard earned money to go on the outing, so it was no surprise that they all became really pissed to find that Brisson was willingly hoaxing them. Some were also not impressed to watch Zollie over-react to a stone hitting nearby that he was observed kicking himself ... so much so that it seemed pre-maturily exaggerated. So yet another image of an alleged Sasquatch surfices like this one below and taken at the same location as another photo that Brisson first led Steenburg to believe it is his (Randy's), and nowconnected back to Brisson. It is not being implied that you have hoaxed, but rather you may have some information as to the image's history. I take it that you have no information on either photo. Furthermore, both images show close contact with an alleged Sasquatch in the same area and Brisson claims to have contact with Sasquatch in a particular area. Brisson says he has had several encounters with them as they have become so use to him that they don't mind letting him see them. Now the same has been reported about his wife and son ... all having claimed to have had multple sightings. In one encounter - Randy mentions that he has watched a female Sasquatch sit and braid her hair. So here we see below what a appears to possibly be a female Sasquatch with a hairstyle that could easily be baided if one wished to take the time to do it. So we now have a photo of a possible female Sasquatch at a location that another photo Randy has said to be one of his pictures. It's not until Brisson was pressed by Thomas for details that caused Randy to introduce yet a new claim that the original photo intoduced above was not one of his own, but was taken by a female friend of his out of the state of Washington. In closing: Neither image above shows the obvious human shaped face seen at the tree stump, which Randy has also given several contradictory versions of. If you want to test Randy ... go with him into this area without him first having prior notice or a chance to contact one of several people who may be willing to help conduct a hoax. And if you are told a Sasquatch is just behind a tree stump a short distance away and tossing rocks ... insist on going up to the stump and looking over it despite someone like McDonald advising you not to do that. (click on image below to play video)
|
|
sebastian
Really into this!
Detective Gadget & Moderator
Posts: 512
|
Post by sebastian on Oct 17, 2012 1:19:31 GMT -5
I can positively identify the two in the first photo. The subject on the left is Bigfoot. The humanoid figure is Chuck Norris. Based on my calculation, the humanoid is wearing a jean jacket and only Chuck Norris will wear such outfit these days.
|
|
|
Post by bigfoothunter on Oct 18, 2012 7:27:19 GMT -5
Brian,
Would you agree that hoaxing in the Sasquatch field is wrong and harms the credibility of the established hoaxer, if not the Sasquatch community as a whole?
|
|
Richard
Really into this!
Thinking I should be out in the bush ...
Posts: 562
|
Post by Richard on Oct 20, 2012 18:38:14 GMT -5
I can positively identify the two in the first photo. The subject on the left is Bigfoot. The humanoid figure is Chuck Norris. Based on my calculation, the humanoid is wearing a jean jacket and only Chuck Norris will wear such outfit these days. Indeed and Chuck Norris is the only guy cool enough that Bgfoot would be seen with in public! R
|
|
|
Post by bigfoothunter on Oct 24, 2012 14:58:19 GMT -5
Brian, Would you agree that hoaxing in the Sasquatch field is wrong and harms the credibility of the established hoaxer, if not the Sasquatch community as a whole? Brian Bland, You must be reading the thread or else you would not have initially responded to the topic in such a timely fashion, so why have you not merely answered a question pertaining to your views about hoaxing in general? I must ask that question because it seems in the past that people who have been suckered by hoaxers were still quite able to denounce such behavior in general terms, while people who would not say anything had their own personal agenda.
|
|
|
Post by Gerry on Oct 24, 2012 22:40:33 GMT -5
Silence is deafening....
|
|
billr
Really into this!
Posts: 856
|
Post by billr on Oct 24, 2012 22:49:11 GMT -5
His last log in date was Oct 15, 2012, so if he is reading this thread he would be on as a guest I think
|
|
|
Post by bigfoothunter on Oct 25, 2012 7:31:42 GMT -5
His last log in date was Oct 15, 2012, so if he is reading this thread he would be on as a guest I think It seems that his intuition was working fine when a post just happen to go up pertaining to his radio show, so I cannot help but feel that he is aware of my question despite when he has logged in last.
|
|
billr
Really into this!
Posts: 856
|
Post by billr on Oct 25, 2012 21:41:35 GMT -5
I agree but we are only guessing
|
|