|
|
Post by Jason C. on Aug 8, 2012 0:11:02 GMT -5
Some photos of an alleged 2009 sighting in Ontario have surfaced. Instead of posting the pics illegally or repeating what is on the blog, here is the link... www.ontariobigfoot.com/Temagami%20Bigfoot.htmlDoes anyone know Timothy Ervick of Ontario Wildlife Field Research-Ontario Bigfoot? I am curious as to who sat on the photos, and why. |
|
|
|
Post by bigfoothunter on Aug 8, 2012 6:27:12 GMT -5
The alleged subject was said to notice the photographer with the camera and yet it continues to look in another direction for (5 mins?) ... the photographer did nothing to get the subject to turn towards the camera ... and it simply disappeared with no acounting of where it went.  |
|
|
|
Post by westerncanadian on Aug 8, 2012 10:48:16 GMT -5
I have looked at the pictures several times and in some of them there are anomalies that are unnatural and don't make sense. One of these is two objects at the same distance not being of the same focus, one object is in focus while the other isn't. That shouldn't happen.
This week I will be attempting to contact the OPP detachment in New Liskeard as to whether there was a report filed. I can't see anyone being stupid enough to file a false report to the police so if they really did report it, that adds a little to the credibility of the photographers.Tim Ervick apparently has the names of the people from the Ministry of Natural Resources who went to investigate.
These photos look too good to be true, but after all investigative avenues have been exhausted, they could prove to be authentic. Until then they are just interesting and I personally am prepared for disappointment again.
|
|
Richard
Really into this!
Thinking I should be out in the bush ...
Posts: 562
|
Post by Richard on Aug 8, 2012 16:23:54 GMT -5
WesternCanadian: I too found the images to be off ... dare I say forgeries.
If you can access to the original copies, I would be more than happy to do some forensic analysis on the images, at least be able to tell if they are manipulated images at a software level rather than costume level.
Richard
|
|
Sean V.
Has opinions now!
Alberta Sasquatch Researcher
Posts: 256
|
Post by Sean V. on Aug 8, 2012 18:33:32 GMT -5
I saw these photographs a couple of days ago. When I had my first look at them, one thing that stood out for me was that certain photographs looked as if they had been photoshopped/touched-up, especially the "second" photograph where you see the profile. It looked as if the back ground had been added to the photograph later on.
|
|
|
|
Post by Jason C. on Aug 9, 2012 2:29:45 GMT -5
This week I will be attempting to contact the OPP detachment in New Liskeard as to whether there was a report filed. I agree John, that would add a lot of credibility to the story coming from the reporting person. As Bill pointed out, the behavior of the alleged sasquatch seems odd (not that I know any  ) as does the reported actions of the photographer. I would like to know more. |
|
|
|
Post by Gerry on Aug 31, 2012 20:46:47 GMT -5
Doesn't look like anything on a realistic plane...
imho
|
|
duallie
Has opinions now!
Posts: 191
|
Post by duallie on Sept 8, 2012 22:13:30 GMT -5
Doesn't look like anything on a realistic plane... imho agree 100%. not even in the slightest. and these people should be called out and labelled hoaxers. |
|
|
|
Post by Gerry on Sept 20, 2012 16:41:52 GMT -5
I mean...when you see a picture of a person or an animal, you know what you are looking at.
This object ( human or animal ) appears to be not in sinc with its surroundings!
|
|
Sean V.
Has opinions now!
Alberta Sasquatch Researcher
Posts: 256
|
Post by Sean V. on Sept 22, 2012 22:01:01 GMT -5
Kind of reminds me of the Wild Creek hoax photographs, as the creature just doesn't jive with its surroundings.
|
|
) as does the reported actions of the photographer. 
