|
Post by lookoutman7 on Aug 21, 2005 13:18:36 GMT -5
Talking to some of the Management areas in the Fire Tower situations, and amongst Forestry...they have told me, that they do not go public with accounts from their actual log-books. There could very well be information tucked away in there. I have found one case of this already from Arizona.
lookoutman.
|
|
|
Post by thomassteenburg on Aug 21, 2005 23:56:10 GMT -5
Talking to some of the Management areas in the Fire Tower situations, and amongst Forestry...they have told me, that they do not go public with accounts from their actual log-books. There could very well be information tucked away in there. I have found one case of this already from Arizona. lookoutman. Glen do you know in Alberta keeps records from forest towers. I looked into that question about 9 years ago and was told yes but they were not open to the public? However that may be possible today with the freedom of information act? Thomas Steenburg
|
|
|
Post by lookoutman7 on Aug 22, 2005 19:53:42 GMT -5
Thomas-
I'm sure that the Canadian side keeps records also. From the Fire Tower individuals that I know, this would seem to be the case. I haven't raised the question much on this side of the border though, concerning pursuing those records.
This topic is a little touchy with the job. If the Tower individual feels that this could hurt their position or tarnish their reputation, you won't see it go in the logs. But they might keep a personal record? It seems you won't be in a Lookout long, if you see a Bigfoot banging rocks together all the time. And, I'm not sure the Forestry would agree to release them. In the U.S. - they mentioned contacting the individual Districts.
But I'm just finding out, that maybe logs are being stored away in some kind of archives. Especially Towers that have been DNR'd. I don't think that in all cases, that those materials are destroyed? There may also be the case, where they haven't even been read? No problem from 'Joe Lookout' - just file the paperwork.
I hope this helps...
Glen(lookoutman.) ;D
|
|
|
Post by Gerry on Aug 23, 2005 13:38:57 GMT -5
Facinating thoughts..but all too probably true that either, the report..or the reporter..was 86-ed as quickly as possible if such an encounter was ever revealed.
|
|
|
Post by lookoutman7 on Aug 23, 2005 19:08:09 GMT -5
Gerry- That may happen in that line of work. I've already heard of a case, where the next person to man the tower, mentioned to another about being out there to long - they may have seen something. This is another example of reputation, going in the Bigfoot's favor. Thomas- I've had an e-mail message from the Chairman of the FFLA. As far as he knows, there are no archives or policy in place to preserve those logs. And when the towers are cleaned and such, the logs are junked. Sometimes they may end up surfacing at a Ranger Station, but they're gradually tossed from there as well. It may be a matter of timing - intercepting the logs? I plan on looking into it a little more. If very few people care about the paper-work...maybe it's time to scout them out? Glen
|
|
|
Post by thomassteenburg on Aug 23, 2005 22:00:46 GMT -5
Gerry- That may happen in that line of work. I've already heard of a case, where the next person to man the tower, mentioned to another about being out there to long - they may have seen something. This is another example of reputation, going in the Bigfoot's favor. Thomas- I've had an e-mail message from the Chairman of the FFLA. As far as he knows, there are no archives or policy in place to preserve those logs. And when the towers are cleaned and such, the logs are junked. Sometimes they may end up surfacing at a Ranger Station, but they're gradually tossed from there as well. It may be a matter of timing - intercepting the logs? I plan on looking into it a little more. If very few people care about the paper-work...maybe it's time to scout them out? Glen ???Thats rather a silly policy, though not a surprising one. I wonder why they bother keeping a log at all.
|
|
|
Post by Gerry on Sept 1, 2005 14:11:32 GMT -5
Fire log? ? HahahAHa!! I kill myself...sometimes.. then again... never mind!
|
|
|
Post by lookoutman7 on Sept 1, 2005 19:26:38 GMT -5
Okay...Gerry - enough out of you! But those Fire Logs do burn for years - then they become ashes. Glen.
|
|
|
Post by bill green on Sept 1, 2005 21:08:02 GMT -5
hi everyone good evening has there been any newer sasquatch sightings,footprints discoveries,nests,stacked rocks,& strange sounds in wildernesses of montana. please keep me posted ok. p.s. is there any expeditions or trips planned to look for sasquatch creatures in montana please dont forget your cameras and camcorders and camtrackers. thanks bill green ct usa sasquatch researcher.
|
|
|
Post by lookoutman7 on Sept 2, 2005 10:45:39 GMT -5
Hi Bill- I'm looking into the Montana area at the moment. We'll be going back into the area next year for a look-see. More pressing business right now. Good luck with your research as well. lookoutman.
|
|
|
Post by bill green on Sept 3, 2005 20:46:24 GMT -5
hi lookoutman7 good evening your very welcome for the reply back to me.i hope you have wonderful luck with your sasquatch expedition next year in montana forests. meanwhile i hope your bring cameras or camtrackers if you go any trips to montana forests to look for sasquatch evidence. so has anyone here ever found footprints in montana and put plaster to make plastercasts. so has there been any resent sasquatch activity in montana. thanks bill green please keep in touch ok. sidenote please feel free to email me sometime so we can talk about sasquatch research. billgreenctbigfoot@sbcglobal.net
|
|
|
Post by lookoutman7 on Sept 17, 2005 14:50:43 GMT -5
Bushman and myself talked a little about this - and I recently posted it on the BFF Forum under (Independent Research - Might as well post it here.) It involves if the Sasquatch can use primitive tools or things that will assist it in it's endeavors. Has anything been proven on this line, or been reported? In our particular find, it involves five thin sharp pieces of shale-like rock that was purposely placed in an indentation in the small rock wall area to the south side of the Lookout. No other pieces of anything was present here - no loose rock. lookoutman
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Sept 17, 2005 23:52:41 GMT -5
Lookoutman7...I also posted this on the BFF: I know we spoke of these details on the phone, but what size were these five sharp pieces of shale rock that you found? And, in your opinion, could these sharp pieces of shale have been used as a primitive weapon?
Bushman
|
|
|
Post by lookoutman7 on Sept 18, 2005 1:50:06 GMT -5
Four toes - Rugaru
Group: Members Posts: 291 Joined: 14-March 04 Location: Calgary, Alberta BF Encounter: Yes
Bushman...
All very much the same in size, each object was approximately 5 1/2" long, and 2 1/2" in height. The thickness remained about 1/4".
All by themselves sitting there, you couldn't help but notice them. They were easily accessible. You could see they had been picked, and placed there. They sat about 4 feet off the ground.
There was no evidence of their use. Adrian and I wrote them off to man putting them there. Still, I tossed them down the bank all the same.
With their appearance, they could have been used for scratching, digging, scraping, or for a weapon.
We had the opportunity that evening, to think about the thought that went into selecting the pieces, roughly the same size - then being placed there. *Taken from BFF Forum...
lookoutman
|
|
|
Post by bill green on Sept 18, 2005 23:58:52 GMT -5
hi everyone good evening im sure sasquatch activity will definetly pick up soon becouse the winter months are comeing that will make the creatures be seen more often looking for more food resources etc. plus the creatures will probley be starting to make bedding areas or nests or go in caves to keep warm. thanks bill please keep me posted ok.
|
|