sebastian
Really into this!
Detective Gadget & Moderator
Posts: 512
|
DNA
Feb 28, 2012 23:35:31 GMT -5
Post by sebastian on Feb 28, 2012 23:35:31 GMT -5
Seriously, Bigfoot Hunter Bill, you have nothing to say about this?
|
|
|
Post by lorelei on Feb 28, 2012 23:38:59 GMT -5
""I see there is talk out there about the Erickson, and Melba DNA samples, There is no contamination of any samples, They use the Roots of the Hair, The Hair I have from 5 Sasquatch people, I saw 3 of them leave the Hair, This Hair all came back as postive 100 percent in all my samples, Melba and other DNA experts have done the testing on this. Too much talk about this and that, The experts know whats real and if contaminated, very easy. Adrian would not have spent thousands on my Hair samples just for fun, He belived in me and trusted me, like I do with him. many have no idea what goes on with this, and how hard and dangerous it was for me to get the Hair."
So now Brisson is claiming three encounters? Five sasquatch in total? This tiny little liar just doesn't know where to quit. I think he is suffering from little man been ignored far too long syndrome. Unfortunately the attention he first received from Thomas and Sebastian and from the members of this forum unleashed a gaping need to be accepted and admired. Also unfortunately he will never get what he seeks because he is standing on shaky ground and lying about his so called evidence...and liars never feel like they belong.
|
|
duallie
Has opinions now!
Posts: 191
|
DNA
May 14, 2012 3:38:52 GMT -5
Post by duallie on May 14, 2012 3:38:52 GMT -5
You need proof of source, ie you need to know where your original source came from this. and the same with the "steak" that is currently being tested in that scierra case. it's impossible for any dna sample to be confirmed as a bf when there has never been a bf source to match anything to. that's what makes all these claims of "i have samples and they are being tested" so completely foolish. test them til the cows come home, it still won't prove a single thing.
|
|
Sean V.
Has opinions now!
Alberta Sasquatch Researcher
Posts: 256
|
DNA
May 14, 2012 17:01:35 GMT -5
Post by Sean V. on May 14, 2012 17:01:35 GMT -5
You need proof of source, ie you need to know where your original source came from Exactly.
|
|
|
DNA
Nov 25, 2012 19:17:59 GMT -5
Post by extrumpet on Nov 25, 2012 19:17:59 GMT -5
|
|
|
DNA
Nov 26, 2012 1:36:43 GMT -5
Post by Jason C. on Nov 26, 2012 1:36:43 GMT -5
Any thoughts on the Texas DNA reports coming out? *yawn*
|
|
billr
Really into this!
Posts: 856
|
DNA
Nov 30, 2012 19:26:20 GMT -5
Post by billr on Nov 30, 2012 19:26:20 GMT -5
|
|
billr
Really into this!
Posts: 856
|
DNA
Nov 30, 2012 19:28:38 GMT -5
Post by billr on Nov 30, 2012 19:28:38 GMT -5
|
|
billr
Really into this!
Posts: 856
|
DNA
Dec 27, 2012 9:23:48 GMT -5
Post by billr on Dec 27, 2012 9:23:48 GMT -5
Some test results from the Sierra kills Bear and human mix by the look of it Sierra Evidence Initiative Team release: www.sierrasiteproject.com/Bigfoot Evidence blog release http://bigfooteviden...es.html#moretop PDF of Release Statement https://docs.google....NFRTQjRmUXItWGc PDF of Lab Report From Trent University https://docs.google....S1pGT3pnWDZYWTg
|
|
billr
Really into this!
Posts: 856
|
DNA
Dec 27, 2012 9:30:33 GMT -5
Post by billr on Dec 27, 2012 9:30:33 GMT -5
The original release of the reports in my last post is on bigfoot forums if you want to check them out
|
|
Richard
Really into this!
Thinking I should be out in the bush ...
Posts: 562
|
DNA
Dec 27, 2012 23:30:12 GMT -5
Post by Richard on Dec 27, 2012 23:30:12 GMT -5
Correct me if I am wrong - then the Bigfoot flesh is no more than bear hide with obvious human contamination?
R
|
|
billr
Really into this!
Posts: 856
|
DNA
Dec 28, 2012 8:37:28 GMT -5
Post by billr on Dec 28, 2012 8:37:28 GMT -5
That is correct and Justin had given dna samples via cheek swabs which matched the human dna found in the study
|
|
|
DNA
Dec 29, 2012 9:26:39 GMT -5
Post by bigfoothunter on Dec 29, 2012 9:26:39 GMT -5
Question: In Ketchum's last radio show interview on Coast to Coast, she stated that a man gave her hair samples for DNA testing which she later found out that the samples belonged to yet another man who seeemed likeable - was alleged to be a known hoaxer - was disabled - who pleaded to be a part of her study - and who this individual and another man tried to get her to contract with them that led to a dispute over a contract that she never agreed to. Ketchum had also remarked that the original guy who misreresented the samples as his own was now deceased.
Does anyone know who these players might be that Ketchum had referenced???
|
|
Richard
Really into this!
Thinking I should be out in the bush ...
Posts: 562
|
DNA
Dec 29, 2012 11:58:15 GMT -5
Post by Richard on Dec 29, 2012 11:58:15 GMT -5
Venting time: It is just me, or do you feel that we are fueling this twit's fire by even discussing this load of BS? By giving hoaxers time in any medium we are just allowing the cycle to continue and giving an avenue for future hoaxers to get their 15min in the spotlight. I too have given this fellow my time by paying attention to it ... We have a lot of knowledgable and skilled folks here and it sees such a waste to even mention it here... Maybe it is just me and I just need morning coffee R
|
|
billr
Really into this!
Posts: 856
|
DNA
Dec 29, 2012 18:26:55 GMT -5
Post by billr on Dec 29, 2012 18:26:55 GMT -5
If we ignore the hoaxers and not point out their acts, then their claims face no opposition and eventually they become internet "facts" Even now their are people on bff supporting his claim
|
|