|
Post by bigfoothunter on Sept 28, 2010 15:01:31 GMT -5
Davis goes on radio shows saying he'd like to hear a better explanation from someone for what he says he sees on the P/G film and yet when I responded to his videos that are currently on Youtube ... I find that he removed my previous response on one video and has blocked me from responding to any of his video claims altogether. So much for MK wanting other peoples views and/or explanations! Davis says one thing as if he wants answers and yet his actions demonstrate pure propaganda on his part. Bill Bigfoot Field Research www.youtube.com/watch?v=VF_H8w_ncRA&feature=related
|
|
Sean V.
Has opinions now!
Alberta Sasquatch Researcher
Posts: 256
|
Post by Sean V. on Sept 29, 2010 12:30:53 GMT -5
The only reviews Marlon Davis wants are positive ones. Anyone who criticizes what he has done is immediately considered the enemy.
I was permanently banned on a forum for saying that his results had me shaking my head wondering where he was getting this stuff from. The only ones that continued to post there were the people who gave 100% support & showed total belief in what he was saying.
I used to really respect the man, but this massacre nonsense has dropped that respect almost down to nothing.
|
|
|
Post by westerncanadian on Oct 1, 2010 3:14:53 GMT -5
Don't waste your time on Davis. He once was an asset to this field, but his incessant need to over-analyze every micron of the Patterson/Gimlin film means that he ran out of legit things to point out and is now deliriously seeing things tha aren't there. It's a great pity as he now has nothing to offer to the field except his seriously bad notions that are not based on any semblance of factuality. Can it be very long before he sees zippers and bells on the creature? Oops! Oh, sorry someone's been there and done that before.
|
|
|
Post by bigfoothunter on Apr 21, 2011 14:34:19 GMT -5
The shoddy half-baked claims of MK Davis are coming to DVD! From the mouth of the screwball helping Davis ... What is it with these people ... I personally cannot believe that all of them have gone stupid at the same time, so a motive for such reckless research practices must be afoot. For instance, Bobbie Short now has on her site - images of BCM whereas it is still being pushed that the pilot is Bob Titmus. Bobbie Short is a nurse for Christ sakes ... other than a receding hairline ... what in the hell could she see that makes her think that the pilot is Titmus. Would it not make sense to first find out how tall Bob Titmus was ... according to people who were around Titmus ... Bob was 5' 4" to 5' 5". Gimlin, who is 5'6", has said that he was an inch or two taller than Titmus. Steenburg who is 5'8" has said that he was several inches taller than Titmus. The Pilot in the BCM film is within a couple of inches of being John Green's height. Gimlin in a white hat and standing next to John Green for a height comparison: So why after Short being made aware of her mistake by way of the clearer BCM photo showing the pilot to be much younger than the wrinkles faced Titmus of 1963 would she be playing the fool and allowing someone to place false propaganda into a dead man's Eulogy? If Bobbie Short's less than adequate investigation and observation skills are to be a reflection of other nurses short-comings as a whole, then it is little wonder that hospitals are now making patients wear name bracelets. This whole Massacre nonsense has gone beyond some crackpot's lack of interpretation ethics and skills to a propaganda game being pursued by apparently sick individuals who have no interest in the truth. Someone tell me if they can ... how is this any different than that of the clowns who were behind the Georgia Bigfoot in a freezer hoax??? Bill Bigfoot Field Research
|
|
|
Post by Gerry on Apr 21, 2011 15:07:36 GMT -5
There is no difference what so ever. The sad thing of it is that Davis was once respected! He has not been for a number of years now. This Johnsen is another scary character. Nothing worse than zealots thinking that they truly have a cause. How can we make the general public consider that this field is worthy of serious consideration when half of us already have one foot out the door because of 'Whack' Jobs like these people.
|
|
|
Post by bigfoothunter on Apr 22, 2011 11:35:19 GMT -5
"How can we make the general public consider that this field is worthy of serious consideration when half of us already have one foot out the door because of 'Whack' Jobs like these people."
We can first expose these individuals and then distance ourselves from them. This sends a message that it is not an all or nothing belief system to everyone in this field, and that merely throwing crap at the wall so to see if anything sticks is irresponsible and certainly does not represent the level of research that others are trying to achieve.
If one looks at the parties involved that are doing this sort of thing, then a common denominator starts to surface. These individuals have an agenda to push responsible vital research practices aside so to slander others. It's the type of person who hasn't the good sense to first get the facts on someone like Bob Titmus before erroneously claiming he is the tall guy in the BCM film so to tie Bob into some Sasquatch skinning. It's the type of person who then takes that lie and shoves it into a dead man's Eulogy. It's the type of person who adds color to a set of hands so to make them appear red from above the wrist to the fingertips so to support a fabricated claim of a vicious dog attack without bothering to think as to why would a dog bite leave behind anything but some tooth punctures that may or may not be bleeding in the first half a second or so after the alleged deed.
These people have become a cancer to this field in my view.
Bill Bigfoot Field Research
|
|
|
Post by goldenstar on Dec 26, 2011 11:23:33 GMT -5
I have just stumbled upon this forum and am stunned by the suggestion that a "massacre" took place at Bluff Creek. I was the pilot that flew Green, Dahinden, the dog with it's handler to N. California in August 1967. Unfortunately my recollection of the trip is a bit hazy after so many years. I remember a rifle was taken into the forest, I carried it for most of the time. We were taken to the site that the footprints were found at and the dog let loose. It followed the trail of footprints to the point where they left the logging road. As it was getting late we decided to return the next morning but unfortunately the dog was unable to pick up the trail again. We spent a few more days taking photos and making plaster casts of the footprints. No "massacre" took place, it is absolutely absurd and laughable! Attachments:
|
|
|
Post by mikemike on Dec 29, 2011 7:37:34 GMT -5
Amazing picture goldenstar! I'm sure that people here will want to ask you a few questions. I don't really know what to ask, but could you say a bit more on the feeling of the whole time in Aug 97. At the time were Green and Dahinden pretty sure it was legit or were they skeptical?
|
|
|
Post by westerncanadian on Jan 1, 2012 17:25:30 GMT -5
Goldenstar, Welcome to the forums. Thanks for posting the photo of White Lady, her owner and yourself. Those who think you are Bob Titmus must be blind. Your photo from that trip clearly shows that you bear no resemblance at all to Titmus. You obviously were up there with Dahinden and Green in August whenthe foliage was green. The massacre is supposed to have taken place in October when the foliage is clearly red in many instances, but in all the colour photos John Green has of all you guys at Blue Creek Mountain it is positively green. Thefact that you as an independentwitness can corroborate that there was no massacre surely means the last nail has been hammered into the coffin of M.K. Davis' insane theory based on dreadful methodology. Do you by any chance have any other photos of your visit to Blue Creek Mountain in 1967? Also are you able to furnish us with your observations of the events of that time frame and your thoughts on the amazing prints that were in abundance at the site. Many thanks.
|
|
duallie
Has opinions now!
Posts: 191
|
Post by duallie on Jan 17, 2012 14:13:57 GMT -5
those guys can claim a massacre all they want. anyone with even a small bit of intelligence can see it is a complete farce. even talking about them is giving them too much credibility.
they claim a massacre, yet can show nothing of just "what" was massacred.
|
|
|
Post by bigfoothunter on Jan 28, 2012 1:49:59 GMT -5
|
|
sebastian
Really into this!
Detective Gadget & Moderator
Posts: 512
|
Post by sebastian on Jan 29, 2012 17:09:42 GMT -5
Bill, awesome stuff! I don't know if you can hammer any more nail in this coffin.
|
|
billr
Really into this!
Posts: 856
|
Post by billr on Jan 31, 2012 22:42:15 GMT -5
I can't believe this garbage has any life left. Bill thanks for your efforts to take the trash out
|
|