Sean V.
Has opinions now!
Alberta Sasquatch Researcher
Posts: 256
|
Post by Sean V. on Sept 17, 2010 2:27:32 GMT -5
Also, all comments made on his video have to be approved by him first. So its a damned good bet that nothing negative, not even critical will ever appear there. It will look as if everything being said by those who watch the video is supportive.
This (in my opinion) is another clear sign of someone trying to hide/cover up something.
My comment there was not approved, so I will make it here. I said: *Theres not alot in your video that would make me believe that you are dealing with Sasquatch sign.* The part that really made me shake my head was where he stepped on the suppossed huge track. All the investigators I know would never ruin a track like that, except by accident.
|
|
|
Post by bigfoothunter on Sept 17, 2010 19:27:06 GMT -5
Posting his behavior on the forums seems to be making him have to play fair and go ahead and allow criticism. Your post is on his site now, along with my remarks about which location did Brisson give Erickson for his alleged Sasquatch head on a stump photos. I reminded McDonald that he recently said that anything Brisson has done should be suspect and I also reminded him that Brisson has given two totally different locations for his photo.
I might also add that McDonald has yet to address why he never went back to his alleged Sasquatch print and show us the soil ahead and behind the said track. I mean really .... who finds Sasquatch tracks with the creature said to be just ahead of them thrashing brush (which isn't seen or heard on the video) and they not return to the track or tracks for further investigation.
I simply find McDonald to not be credible in the excuses he has given for his behavior at the alleged track location.
Bill Bigfoot Field Research
|
|
Sean V.
Has opinions now!
Alberta Sasquatch Researcher
Posts: 256
|
Post by Sean V. on Sept 18, 2010 2:51:30 GMT -5
The thing that made me laugh was reading his Youtube post where he said not to bother him because he has depression & PTSD. He really seems to be grasping at straws in an attempt to cover up his previous misdeeds.
|
|
|
Post by thomassteenburg on Sept 22, 2010 4:10:20 GMT -5
It should be noted that as of right now Bruce McDonald is still posting replies on his you tube site to questions put him by Bill Miller that are now days old knowing full while that Bill can not respond back due to the fact he has been blocked. I tried to point this out only to find that I also have been blocked. Now if he has chosen to cut off the debate than the proper thing to do is not add any further comments your self in a desperate attempt to save face. But you can see the timing listed on the comments. Bill Miller post 4 days ago. Bruce replied 4 hours ago. No chance of counter debate as bill and myself have been blocked.
Thomas Steenburg
|
|
|
Post by bigfoothunter on Sept 22, 2010 13:38:51 GMT -5
Let me offer an example of Bruce McDonald's sense of fair play ...
While knowing that he has blocked myself and Steenburg from posting, McDonald posted this -----
trailriderresearch 21 hours ago
"Bill when you are having an argument, you absolutely must follow what the other person says in response. faking mis-comprehensions to establish a falsehood you later quote yourself on and declare as fact is a signature tactic of yours, very cheeseball stuff" (end)
What McDonald is referring to is my saying that his video doesn't support the excuse that he couldn't film the ground just ahead and behind his alleged Bigfoot track because he was in pursuit of the track maker thrashing the brush just ahead of him.
McDonald claimed that he didn't say the word 'thrashing'. McDonald was correct ... he said 'breaking sticks' just ahead of him. In other words he tries to discredit the facts that I pointed out by playing on words which I used that didn't change the point I had made.
Elsewhere McDonald said, "soft soil ? pardon me but you just made another assumption" (end)
My remark about the 'soft forest soil' went to McDonald showing a deep indentation in the ground and not finding a second one ahead or behind it. In other words the ground was soft enough to allow one indentation, but not a second or a third indentation ahead or behind his alleged Bigfoot track.
I believe this to be why McDonald initially invented the quick response that he regretted having not done a better job investigating the alleged scene because he knew if something that heavy could make such a dent in the forest soil, then the same should have been done each time the alleged track maker stepped in similar soil conditions along its path of travel.
I found McDonald to be making his story up as he went and this was why his off-the-cuff statements weren't adding up with the evidence he had earlier presented. McDonald is simply too stupid to see that his behavior is not suiting him well. I can only assume this is why Brisson had told Steenburg in a voice message that Bruce McDonald is a nut!
One must ask what has happened to the Bigfoot field as more and more inept investigation is being offered as good proof of the existence of the Sasquatch. The last I heard, Bobbie Short still buys into the Brisson head on a stump claim. The fact that Randy has told several versions of his claim and that our actual recreation of the image with Steenburg behind the stump doesn't seem to matter to these people.
As I recall, I think McDonald said that Brisson also has two films of the alleged head on a stump subject ... yet who can say they have seen it? And who films what they believe to be a real Sasquatch and only mentions having done this, but has never showed it?? And who'd be dumb enough to make such a claim knowing damn well they will never be able to back it up??? (I can name a few)
Bill Bigfoot Field Research
|
|
|
Post by bigfoothunter on Sept 22, 2010 14:07:02 GMT -5
Here is another Bruce McDonald attempt at misleading the viewer ... McDonald: 9 hours ago. "I recall the distance between the stump and the tree the alleged Sasquatch is between to be around 17 to 19. Exact figures ?? you are simply amazing Bill. truly amazing The volume of text you generate is inversely proportional to its value" What disgruntled Bruce is talking about is that I had posted that the distance between the stump and the tree directly behind it that the alleged Sasquatch would be standing between was between 17" and 19". I had said that the figures I gave had come from memory and that the exact measurement Tom and I had made were in Tom's possession. McDonald offered no measurements of his own, no photos depicting otherwise, nor did he offer any excuse as to why (if my figures were correct) that they would somehow be in error. Is it any wonder why he must block further responses so he can merely say things in a slanted way to try and cover up the con-job he has attempted to run concerning his video and the Brisson Sasquatch on a stump claim. McDonald in his desperation made the remark that Brisson's story changes didn't mean anything because Randy had the photos to back the sighting up. McDonald justifies his position by saying that a photo doesn't lie. This is what I mean when I say that not only does McDonald not care to spread dis-information through out the Bigfoot community, but he also doesn't care that we know he does it. One example of how a photo can be made to lie. The old Chapman cabin that has long since been gone is placed onto a recent photo taken at Ruby Creek. Bill Bigfoot Field Research
|
|
Sean V.
Has opinions now!
Alberta Sasquatch Researcher
Posts: 256
|
Post by Sean V. on Sept 23, 2010 22:57:05 GMT -5
Perhaps the best way to let this die is to just let him ramble on. People will eventually get tired of him & news will spread that he is a hoaxer.
Just a thought.
|
|
duallie
Has opinions now!
Posts: 191
|
Post by duallie on Feb 27, 2011 20:44:55 GMT -5
if his stuff was real, it would clearly speak for itself. there would be no need for his defensive responses. he clearly hasn't taken his medication in awhile.
|
|
|
Post by thomassteenburg on Mar 16, 2011 12:20:45 GMT -5
You know it's amassing. This guy just will not stop. We leave him alone for awhile and he just can't resist keeping the fire burning on his You tube site. www.youtube.com/watch?v=ik4gLDQuWwsHere is the write up under the video in case this Link does not work or disappears real fast. START QUOTE "Adrian Erickson Project" contributor Randy Brisson's evidence is confirmed by myself and an associate finding a track in the hard surface of an embankment 5 or so feet high, I discovered a single track, 100 yards from the stump where the Randy Brisson 2009 bigfoot picture series were taken. Bill Miller and Thomas Steenburg collaborated using photo-shop false manipulations to portray the Brisson images as a hoax. They went to a great deal of trouble in an effort to call attention to themselves by using fakery and falsehoods over the 2009 Brisson "Sasquatch face images". One must truly wonder how many innocent witnesses have come forward contacting Thomas Steenburg only to be cruelly humiliated by the Steenburg/Miller tag team. I want my viewers to understand that neither Miller nor Steenburg have ever had a Bigfoot encounter. Are they qualified to judge who has ? My investigations at the 2009 site produced the discovery of this track. Ask yourself who is an actual researcher here ? The pattern of scoffing at experiencers coming forward with evidence must end. One really has to contemplate what Steenburgs motives are for being in the field when his stated credentials for what qualifies him to be a Sasquatch expert is his expertise in calling someone a liar. Bill Miller is guilty of using photoshop to render legitimate sasquatch images to appear as false. Clearly any image in the future to come from Bill Miller will also be a photoshop job whether or not he claims it as his own or someone else's. Miller has elevated himself to the unenviable position of "The Photoshop Anti-Christ of Bigfoot Imagery" Mr. Brisson, under a Non-diclosure agreement, is collaborating his evidence with Adrian Erickson whom is producing the most definitive Bigfoot documentary to date. questforsasquatch.com/index.htmlwww.alamas.ru/eng/publicat/Brisson_e.htmwww.bigfootencounters.com/sbs/brisson09.htmwww.blogtalkradio.com/search/hiker11/Visit west Coast Sasquatch forum before they delete posts to cover their mistakes Category: END OF QUOTE I now consider this man as a new Beckjord in training. Here we go again. Thomas Steenburg
|
|
|
Post by bigfoothunter on Mar 16, 2011 15:30:26 GMT -5
Interesting that Bruce M says that I manipulated Brisson's pictures with PhotoShop. In fact, I used only Imagestyler 1.0 and simply overlaid one image over another by sizing them equally. Nothing about the images were ever changed concerning what is in them.
Bill Miller Bigfoot Field Rersearch
|
|
duallie
Has opinions now!
Posts: 191
|
Post by duallie on Mar 16, 2011 21:44:53 GMT -5
this guy is getting ridiculous.
if he really saw a bf, and he knows his stuff was legit, he wouldn't take such a defencive role regarding it. he'd know what he saw and wouldn't care what others thought. the fact that he has his back up and is trying his damnedest to convince people, are obvious signs that he's full of bs.
what's sad is that there are people out there who would read that story and look at his pictures and actually believe it.
if any photo manipulating was going on, it was by brisson himself.
|
|
|
Post by bigfoothunter on Mar 17, 2011 12:00:37 GMT -5
Here is the color image I used in my Brisson study. This image was forwarded to me by Thomas Steenburg who had received it from Brisson. I have taken the original (cropped) Brisson image that I was given and placed it over the newest color images (seen in B&W) posted on the Internet in hopes of seeing what exactly was it that I was supposed to have manipulated in accordance with McDonald's latest allegations. I am illustrating therm this way so people can tell one from the other. I could find no differences. McDonald will have to be specific as to what it was exactly that I was supposed to have PhotoShop'd. As usual, Bruce offered no details in his latest psychotic rantings. The images below were overlaid onto each other using ImageStyler 1.0 At this time, I do not know of Brisson taking any part in McDonald's propaganda war. Thomas Steenburg has reminded me of a message that he received from Brisson after the last fiasco that McDonald pulled whereas Randy said that Bruce McDonald has lost his mind and not to think that he (Randy) was involved in McDonald's antics. Bill Miller Bigfoot Field Research
|
|
|
Post by westerncanadian on Mar 17, 2011 17:01:28 GMT -5
Truly the rantings and ravings of a very ill person. There just seems to be an endless stream of verbiage from him that makes zero sense. This is an ego running amok. Nothing he says can be taken seriously and accordingly time should not be wasted on this complete and utter waste of time. Bill and Thomas have been real gentlemen in dealing with this crackpot and I have nothing but the highest respect for the way they have refuted the drivel we have had to suffer from this very pathetic individual.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jun 15, 2011 2:56:55 GMT -5
Hi Friends, I'll be quick. Yes, they are "sas's". But no they are not in "full" body exposure. If you had taken an "heat sensitive" exposure, you wouldn't have gotten anything. I'm no expert and won't attempt to be. I'm new here and will understand your "rebuttals". These are actually "illuminating orbs". There is a form of "protocol" for which the "wise ones" (sasquatch's) answer too, which is the elders. In the spectrum of there respectfulness, and in the "aura" to protect itself, the "wise ones" will scout the area first before actually allowing a physical form to take place. Let me ask you. Were'nt there floating lights durring the night? Also, did you hear the heavy footsteps after these lights? Did whirls of wind blow through the area but no ones hair got messed up or the branches moved? My last question is, how did you feel? Was fear among any of you? If there is any yes's to these questions, rethink what is happening here....thanks for letting me share.
|
|
|
Post by westerncanadian on Jun 21, 2011 1:02:51 GMT -5
HawaiianEye, none of what you say is based on fact. This is a fact-based forum. What you have posted here are statements that belong on a metaphysical forum.
We're dealng with flesh and blood biology here and you had best keep your posts based on science and testability not speculation.
|
|