So, Cameranut bids us all a goodbye, and 1 post later he's back! He obviously can't stay quiet. He'll just be back under a different name anyway.
Cameranut. Well, the last part of his name is definitely accurate. Seriously, he suggests that red orbs and telekinesis are connected with BF. The guy believes that BF causes his headaches with telepathy. His headaches are obviously caused by his brain having trouble trying to make sense of all the nonsense being crammed into it. He needs to pick one 'unknown' and concentrate on just the one, rather than combining them.
BF does not get from one location to another, or continent to another, by riding in spaceships. I've actually read a report where they said that they witnessed a craft landing, and BF walking out! And they link that to why they cannot be found and why there are worldwide sightings.
But back to the main topic.
That photo of the head in the tree is the weakest photo I've seen. Why is the face so much darker than anything else in the photo. It's like it isn't effected by the occurring light and shadows as the rest of the scene. There is nothing impressive about it in any way. I don't believe that anyone said that he 'doctored' the photo as cameranut suggests. I believe that the qualities of the photo may show that it hasn't been altered. That still does not mean that the photo is of a real BF. It isn't exactly difficult to go and place something in the tree.
So why did he bolt outta there after rapid-firing the three shots? Isn't his purpose to find BF??? So, there he is, and he bolts?? REALLY!!!! If you're that frightened of BF then why choose to search for BF? How are you supposed to study something if your reaction is to run away from it?
The video. Ugh! So lame. I could make that same thing every time I go out. Everyone could. There isn't a thing in that video that suggests BF. Even if the rocks were really thrown, nobody seen what or who threw them. You cannot automatically say that it was BF. That happens to me, the very first thing that I'm thinking is that someone's tossing rocks at me. The last thing I'd connect it to is a BF, even if I'm searching for them. After that, rocks are definitely getting tossed back. If it still continues, then I'd look for the culprit. After I chambered a round.
Show me a video of BF tossing rocks. After seeing one, then I'll consider it a possibility.
What 1000 lb. animals is cameranut familiar with, to have an idea of what it's weight must have been. No 1000 lb. animal is walking alongside them the whole time without being heard or seen. Do people not understand how big a 1000 lb. BF would be? Insanely enormous. Shaq is 300 lbs. and around 7 ft. tall. Use his image as a comparison and now over triple his size. Impossible. People's minds have formed an image of the BF 'monster' and grossly oversized him. Those are big slippers to remain silent also.
The other 'encounter' that bothers me is when people suggest a splash in the water is a BF throwing a rock at them. I'm out on lakes alot at night. I go out in the evening on my pontoon boat flyfishing. Pitch black out, headlamp to see, kicking around the lake dragging a fly. Huge splashes occur alot. My reaction? Nice fish! The last thought in my mind is that a BF is tossing rocks at me. Oh sure. I could start screaming and splashing my way back to my truck, bolt outta there, and tell everyone about my amazing BF encounter. Or! I could enjoy the peacefulness of the evening and continue catching fish. I always choose the latter.
I've found the snapped trees and had a couple strange events, but I still don't claim that they were BF-related. They may very well be, but until I witness one, they are just strange events.
And if I did see BF but was unable to get video-proof, I sure wouldn't be wasting my time trying to convince others that I saw it. If you chose not to believe me, fine, I'd know what I saw.
I catch a 30lb. fish and release it, but never got a photo of it. You don't believe I caught a 30lber. I don't care. I know I did. I caught it for me. For my enjoyment. Not for someone else's.
I would not waste senseless time arguing about something that cannot be proven. It's pointless. I don't believe many BF reports. That doesn't mean that they aren't true. But if there isn't sufficient proof, it also doesn't mean that they are.
Good work, Thomas, on exposing obvious hoaxes. And their attacks on you and the rest here are foolish anyway, since their apparent evidence is so, so weak.