|
Post by lorelei on Nov 10, 2008 0:27:22 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by lorelei on Nov 10, 2008 15:09:31 GMT -5
And another one...there really seems to be a renewed interest in sasquatch film making recently...
ColoradoBigFootDocumentary.com
|
|
|
Post by lorelei on Nov 10, 2008 15:09:59 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by rastaman on Nov 11, 2008 3:51:44 GMT -5
Here's the link to Dallas Gilbert's website: www.angelfire.com/co4/OBSC/page1.htmlAnybody really see anything in the photo section. I got 20/20 vision with my eyeglasses, but I still can't see any Bigfoot in his photos. Your eyes get all cross-eyed and blurry from looking at them too long. I would put his documentary definitely in the "Fiction" section, along with his photos.
|
|
|
Post by lorelei on Nov 11, 2008 14:51:19 GMT -5
This is so funny, Sebastian and I were just looking through his site chuckling at all the 'sasquatch' photographs...and I came here to post a link! I can't see anything even if I close one eye and stand on one leg.
|
|
|
Post by rastaman on Nov 11, 2008 16:32:56 GMT -5
Someone please send Dallas an extra digital camera if they got one with auto-focus and maybe a quick intro into focusing a camera properly.
Also, did you check out the white bigfoot video. I didn't know that BF can fly.
Its just too funny.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Nov 11, 2008 16:53:47 GMT -5
Absolutely useless images, unless you really really really 'want' to see something 'take shape'. The photographer/researcher should have added info for each image he is asking the viewers to look at. It's like those puzzle images where you stare and stare and stare and maybe see something different. I stared but saw nothing that proved anything other than the images are all out of focus, are very degraded and show no significant details to determine anything. Did you see 'teeth', did you see a 'smile and outstreched arms', did you see a 'bigfoot in a tree' ? .... honestly ... 'no', I didn't and I'm not about to fall for the 'outline' technique in which the image maker essentially tells the viewer how to interpret the abstract shapes in an unfocused and poor quality image. Nice try, but the differnt background textures for every page were more entertaining ... lol
|
|
|
Post by rastaman on Nov 11, 2008 20:29:47 GMT -5
If they can get photos of themselves so clear on their BF documentary website below, www.notyourtypicalbigfootmovie.com/photos.htmthen why not of a real BF as they claim? Sure makes you realize why the general public think that BF hunters/researchers are a bunch of Quacks. Dallas has also been around for quite a few years now and I'm sure many have emailed him about his poor quality images, but he never improves on them.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Nov 13, 2008 16:04:54 GMT -5
tongue firmly in cheek here but if they are setting the photographic standards with countless pages of out of focus and indistinct images, then yes sasquatch is everywhere and in pretty much any image as well, hehe. If I blur my eyes just right I can just make out ...
|
|