|
Post by biggafoote on Feb 2, 2012 19:41:43 GMT -5
Ah Biggafoote ... at least you are entertaining. ;D I did state that Bigfoot does not exist - I would suggest you re-read my statement. I simply said it hasn't been proven yet .. BIG difference! After all people spend a lifetime with the belief in a supreme being without the need for proof. In terms of academia, well I am sorry to say there ARE many people who have PhDs is various subjects such as anthropology and biology that study the field - including some members of this forum. Of course you already know this as you are quite well read and a pleasure to be around. Spouse you say? Now who ever said I was married? Or that I was a heterosexual? I never stated either .... again, just goes to show you - that you are making far too many assumptions. Now be a good girl and go play in traffic ... your rantings are starting to annoy me R First, you always seem to have too many issues and are willing to at the drop of a hat to impose these ranting self destructive issues on anyones' point of view whom you don't agree with. I can't help you with your insecure self destructive rantings-you really should seek help from a professional your embarrassing yourself. Interesting, usual typical statement from an amature:" the I said so, so it must be so with no hard core imperical data, physical evidence as well as many scientific journals with credible cited reference source materials" as proof to back it up with aurgument. These kindergarden out in left field aurguments are a typical amature statement which amatures normally makes while standing on one's soap box, screaming because I said so, it must be so and I don't need proof to back it up with.The scientific community treats the I said so, so it must be so with no proof to back it up aurgument as unfounded tripe. Any good reputable credible scientist has brains enough to provide the scientific community as well as academia with years hard core imperical data research supported by physical evidence which has been verified by several credible reputable scientists in their field of study and supported by class, phyllum, genious, species, region; era; timeline, ancestory; ect... Not to mention supporting reference source materials in a scientific format as well as providing all science conference, national as well as global science consortium published findings coupled with a consensus of agreement from a panel of widely recognized pulitzer prize winning credible reputable published scientists which you ameuters have failed to do. Even a beginning science student is aware that it takes years and years to prove a loosely woven theory such as the exsistance of Big Foot not to mention understanding that there must be beyond the shadow of a doubt hard core imperical data with supported research and expert verified research. No suprize here that not one of you, including not one of you so called PHDs on this forum can even produce any verified hard core imperical data, physical evidence, supporting scientific journals as well as findings and facts from a global consortium panel of world renouned published scientists verifying your theories-it doesn't suprize me one bit. Instead of standing on your amature soap boxes and screaming like knuckle dragging chimpanzees living in the dark ages. Get your oxygen deprived braindead brains out of the dark ages you call an asset and prove to the world that there is a brain there by getting off your lazy assets and do the work. If you can't do the work then leave the discoveries to the real scientist who can, will and have the brains to do the work. While your at it take your own advice and go find a corner to clean.What is so entertaining is that amatures take poor, grainy, botched photos who can't tell the difference between an animal and a human foot print, stand on their road apple slinging soap boxes sling road apples like juvenile chimpanzees living in the dark ages who attempt to pass the perverbal horse piss in a bottle off as a fire water home remedy expecting the public to be stupid enough to buy this bull. There is an old saying: it doesn't matter if one puts horse piss in a bottle and trys to pass it off as a fire water home remedy cure-it is still horse piss in a bottle and the public is to smart too buy this garbage.
|
|
Richard
Really into this!
Thinking I should be out in the bush ...
Posts: 562
|
Post by Richard on Feb 2, 2012 23:20:22 GMT -5
BiggaFoote: If you are so sure that Bigfoot does not exist - why are you here? Why even Google this site to begin with? You have yet to show me or anyone else here where we lack in critical thinking. - People report seeing something that does not fit with common comparative observations.
- Tracks are left that do in fact reveal a lot of detail - too much for a hoax to have made every single one.
- Researchers make observations - nothing more
The theory stands that there MIGHT be a large primate running around in the recesses of the pacific northwest. It is the goal of ANY scientist to ask questions ... sometimes the answer is no, other times it is yes. We are not set on a particular answer, but rather that one is present. Now if you want to continue to bash anyone that actually has a scientific mind, then please do so - we'll be here to enjoy your company ;D
|
|
sebastian
Really into this!
Detective Gadget & Moderator
Posts: 512
|
Post by sebastian on Feb 3, 2012 0:18:07 GMT -5
I must ask BiggaFoote why are you trying so hard to represent the scientific community while clearly you are not a part of. For example, your "class, phyllum, genious, species, region; era; timeline, ancestory; ect..." is an indication of limited knowledge of biology and geology. Moreover, it is genus not genious. I also like to remind you that taxonomic classification does not include region, era, etc. Science is a methodology, a process based on three fundamental parts. Richard has just pointed out that we have observations. We also have factual data as well. Data that can be quantify and qualify. BiggaFoote, you describe science as an outsider thinks what science should be, which makes you not a part of science.
|
|
Richard
Really into this!
Thinking I should be out in the bush ...
Posts: 562
|
Post by Richard on Feb 4, 2012 20:27:16 GMT -5
Too bad it seems our "friend" has left ... alas I was having fun with the local fauna ;D
|
|
|
Post by westerncanadian on Feb 10, 2012 0:56:10 GMT -5
Biggafoote is a phony who cuts and pastes stuff he reads elsewhere. His spelling is atrocious and no one with a scientific background would be such an appaling speller and make such irrational comments as he has. He has no idea about what he is discussing here and seems only present to stir up trouble. His insulting and degrading remarks do not belong on any forum. If you are going to insult anybody like you have here, I suggest you begin with the person you see in your mirror everyday. Sasquatch research is not a pseudoscience, but Biggafoote is.
|
|
|
Post by albertasasquatch on Feb 19, 2012 10:46:33 GMT -5
Nice to see that Biggafoote has left the building. The spelling alone.....geesh.
|
|
Richard
Really into this!
Thinking I should be out in the bush ...
Posts: 562
|
Post by Richard on Feb 19, 2012 13:44:44 GMT -5
Nice to see that Biggafoote has left the building. The spelling alone.....geesh. Too bad I was having a good time - broke up the rigamarole of the day ;D
|
|
sebastian
Really into this!
Detective Gadget & Moderator
Posts: 512
|
Post by sebastian on Feb 22, 2012 19:55:41 GMT -5
The sad truth is we need people like Biggafoote to keep life interesting. Like a wrestling show, there won't be a show if they are all good guys, right?
|
|
Richard
Really into this!
Thinking I should be out in the bush ...
Posts: 562
|
Post by Richard on Feb 23, 2012 0:10:16 GMT -5
True enough.
Of course, the point of it all is to expand knowledge, not get into a battle of wits with a piece of cardboard ;D
I am new to this forum, but have been "around the block" for a little while ... let's hope the board stays active!!
Richard
|
|
duallie
Has opinions now!
Posts: 191
|
Post by duallie on Feb 25, 2012 0:31:19 GMT -5
You know! I do not like the turn this board is taking lately! When you start talking about the researchers instead of the research...it is time to rethink things. I won't close this thread because it is probably the most important one presently on the site! Bigfoothunter! Quite signaling out individuals on this board and getting a shot in at them. Your input is too valueable for it to just be poking at a person. Chrissie! Get some experience under your belt! Don't talk about other people's exploits or opinions..learn enough to have your own! Speak from your own sasquatch experiences...whether good or bad..as I speak from mine! Maybe some time spent on another board will give you a healthier prospective! Next time anyone steps out of line on a personal level..then they might find themselves facing a suspension for a week, or two. Lets get on with it! hi gerry. that's common practice on other sites, and a good idea. usually it's two or three warnings, then a suspension. mostly because of trolling. however you would apply it is up to you.
|
|
|
Post by Gerry on Mar 13, 2013 13:46:35 GMT -5
Nice to see that the board is a nice calm place these days! Being interactive is good! Pot stirring isn't. Hmmmm. Wonder if I just jinxed myself?
|
|
Richard
Really into this!
Thinking I should be out in the bush ...
Posts: 562
|
Post by Richard on Mar 13, 2013 19:14:51 GMT -5
;D
|
|
Sean V.
Has opinions now!
Alberta Sasquatch Researcher
Posts: 256
|
Post by Sean V. on Mar 13, 2013 21:08:18 GMT -5
Nice to see that the board is a nice calm place these days! Being interactive is good! Pot stirring isn't. Hmmmm. Wonder if I just jinxed myself? Only time will tell, I would guess.
|
|
sebastian
Really into this!
Detective Gadget & Moderator
Posts: 512
|
Post by sebastian on Mar 14, 2013 22:14:03 GMT -5
Want me to call out the rock throwers?
|
|
|
Post by txnative on Apr 21, 2014 11:59:34 GMT -5
The larger the audience....the greater the chance that a heckler is among them....sad
|
|