Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Dec 10, 2005 0:57:20 GMT -5
Does anybody know what I don't?
The outline of the subject doesn't look like a hiker... there is a certain amount of definition. But it does look posed, and could be posed even if it seems tricky. Jury is meeting??
|
|
sebastian
Really into this!
Detective Gadget & Moderator
Posts: 512
|
Post by sebastian on Dec 10, 2005 21:15:26 GMT -5
I think that the problem is that there is no scale in the background to indicate the size of the subject. It is also interesting that there is a line of what looks like footprint tracks in the original photos.
Photos like these don't prove anything. They are just about the fun factor. Serious investigators may find them a waste of time if the authenticity cannot be determined.
cheers,
seb
|
|
|
|
Post by thomassteenburg on Dec 11, 2005 22:11:54 GMT -5
There are where these shots were taken are a well known hiking spot for both summer and winter recreational use, The problem is the figure is once again to far away for a clear detailed photo, also the sun is behind the subject which results in the front of the figure to be in shadow. just as the forward slope of the mountain is in shadow. Even if these are photos of a real sasquatch the photographer was simply to far away.
Thomas Steenburg
|
|
